YouTube

sign up forgot login?
search for these words:
limit on this user:
    

Welcome to the beta environment of Supverse

Supverse is a media platform run by analysts and journalists.
Supverse, the UniVerse of WasSup, allows members to create ad hoc discussions on any page* across the vast Internet. The discussion can be just a reference for yourself, or a diverse audience debate. Organize all research content and references using personal hashtags on your Supverse profile and even stitch together these thoughts into a dynamic presentation you can publish online and share with others. Mingle your philosophies with others in the Supverse global sensorium to create new meanings.
  • Receive personalized emails with new comments made on pages you subscribed to, without signing up.
  • Sign up for a free account and use the cloud to bookmark pages and to leave notes on websites that interest you.
  • Join the discussions that are ongoing, see what trends and becomes news to you, find associated information.
  • Create an online dynamic stream of thought, in a Prezi like environment, and share it with like-minded people.


* At this point not every site is supported.

Use Supverse for:

Review


Research


Rants & Raves

Three Steps to Supverse:

1

Find a URL


2

Supverse it


3

Add your comments


Supverse
Filtered on: #CommunicationsDecencyAct > showing 1 comment covering 100 days
#yawining 1  


Arts
Business
Computers
Games
Health
Home
Recreation
Science
Society
Sports
Section 230 of the #CommunicationsDecencyAct #CDA


In analyzing the availability of the immunity offered by this provision, courts generally apply a three-prong test. A defendant must satisfy each of the three prongs to gain the benefit of the immunity: The defendant must be a "provider or user" of an "interactive computer service." The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff must "treat" the defendant "as the publisher or speaker" of the harmful information at issue. The information must be "provided by another information content provider," i.e., the defendant must not be the "information content provider" of the harmful information at issue.
&neo 2014-07-25  


screenshots generated by page2images | Site Snapshot by PagePeeker | raw sentiment and classification data by uClassify | copyright 2014-2019 DYNO3 LLC | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy